Thursday, February 21, 2013
February 21, 2013, Wahington D.C. RESULTS OF OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARD BY SCOTUS.
A weeks ago I posted SCOTUS was to meet, in conference, regarding the charges of Dr. Orly Taitz against Barry( Barack Hussein Obama) Soetoro on Feb. 15, 2013 and the results would be posted on Feb. 19th, 2013. I also predicted the can would be kicked down the road again. I stated SCOTUS only agreed to the conference as a bow shot warning to the POTUS apparent who threatened to usurp the COTUS by executive order. Here is the result of that conference:
(SCOTUS 02.19.2013 order does not state yet whether the case was granted or denied, no decision yet).
This is a monumental story and none of the major media outlets have reported on this event (a virtual blackout). Does the news media, including FOX News, know something we don't?
-=Glenn K. Fannin Jr.=-
Thursday, October 29, 2009
I don't understand why Obama says he needs more time to make a decision to send more troops to Afghanistan. As a candidate he already made this decision. He said, "We took our eye off Afghanistan. We need to finish the fight on terrorism. I have been arguing about this since 2002. I would send much more resources and at least 2 brigades (6,400) to finish the fight against the terrorists." He now has had over a year, from making these statements, to put his plan, he has had since 2002, into action. He accused the previous administration of dragging their feet and therefore guilty of making America unsafe.
It appears he now agrees, with the Bush administration, Afghanistan is very complicated and proceeding cautiously is what is needed. Thank you, Obama, for now agreeing the Bush administration policy on Afghanistan was the correct one. You are now handling Afghanistan just the way Bush W. did.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Obama Healthcare Plan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4004/a40040103bd81ae1aaf1d1957f06a1fd84f58f44" alt=""
I really don’t know what the problem is. They say they want to provide affordable health care to those who can not purchase it, because of prior health issues, lack of portability or health care insurance is not available from where they work. We have National Flood Insurance (the only Federal Insurance besides ERISSA). Insurance oversight is delegated to the individual states (usually somewhere between 5 and 6 percent goes to the state’s superfund). The states have risk pools for people who can’t buy a particular type of insurance for one reason or another (Home owner’s, Wind, High Risk Auto, Work Comp etc.). These are all available to those who can’t buy them at affordable rates. They are all voluntary. All Congress would have to do is offer this coverage like National Flood Insurance (risk pool coverage). You would have to show you have been turned down for coverage 3 times. Most agents will do this research for you. Then you qualify to buy the insurance from the government. This rule prevents the government run insurance from gaining a monopoly on the insurance market. I find it amazing (with all their supposed intelligence and experience) they are not aware of this option (I haven’t seen it discussed anywhere). Well, logic tells me they aren’t that dumb but they aren’t that stupid. Therefore it has to be by design. They argued 42 million American didn’t have and couldn’t buy insurance. They are now adding 18 to 20 million who don’t want to buy it (mostly young people who think they are immortal). When they say 42 million Americans they are not technically lying. Thirty million of the Forty-two million are either South American, Central American, Mexican American or Canadian American. The United States is only one of the Americas. Obama said they are going to take 40 percent of the money out of Medicare to help fund this Goliath. They can’t even manage Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security (they are all nearly broke). They know what they are doing. They are going to take 40 percent of the money U.S. Citizens have paid into Medicare and pay for the healthcare of illegal aliens. Since they aren’t offering it in the same way National Flood Insurance is awarded then it isn’t about providing affordable health insurance to those who can not buy it. It is about control. It is about wrestling your Bill Of Rights freedoms away from you. It is about eroding these freedoms until the U.S.A. is the U.S.S.A. (United Socialist States of America). A woman who was born in Germany (before WWII) made a frantic call to my wife. She said Hitler started out promising everyone a car. So he took over the German car companies and factories so he could build them. He took over the banks to pay for building all the free cars (Volkswagons or Wagon of the Folks). He encouraged people to turn in their friends and neighbors of those who dissented in this effort. He took over the schools and created a Hitler youth movement. The youths were encouraged to turn in their parents. All of these things had to be done right away because Germany was in such a dire, economical depression. In order to act, here again because things were so bad, he took over the German Congress. The German Congress was too slow and things had to be done right away (Hitler said). This old, German woman was having flash backs between the things Obama is saying and what Hitler was saying. The truth is Obama has a Hope to Change the United States into a socialist, dictatorial regime.
Personally, I left blood and flesh on the battlefield and 4 years of my life, as did my brothers-in-arms, so that you might be free. I am old now and the future is yours. You have the FREEDOM to vote away your FREEDOM if you choose to. It is your choice to squander your legacy if you want to. Or, you can be an activist against any movement which would take away your freedoms. Freedom isn’t free!
By Glenn Fannin
Ling and Lee
When someone does something stupid, and a lot of money is spent rescuing them, it is customary to send the stupid, idiots a bill. Ling and Lee were not kidnapped. They were reporters and were sent there by Al Gore, for his news agency, to enter the N. Korea illegally and get a story. They went there to get either themselves or Al Gore a Pulitzer Prize. They did this in order to get fame and riches. They expected to profit from their exploit. I am very glad they were rescued but the United States apparently gave up a lot to get them back. They should be sent a bill for the rescue. I’m sure their employer, Al Gore, will be glad to pay it since they were on an assignment for him. Did you even wonder why Bill Clinton went there instead of Al Gore? Al Gore probably thought they might have arrested him also as being complicit in the border invasion. So the coward sent Bill Clinton.
-=Glenn Fannin=-
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
We Will Judge Obama On His Performance Alone
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d85/b0d8541f24963cd5a7b28e59fd6f78eb7e27e53d" alt=""
Juan Williams, very profoundly explains, "If his presidency is to represent the full power of the idea that black Americans are just like everyone else -- fully human and fully capable of intellect, courage and patriotism -- then Barack Obama has to be subject to the same rough and tumble of political criticism experienced by his predecessors. To treat the first black president as if he is a fragile flower is certain to hobble him. It is also to waste a tremendous opportunity for improving race relations by doing away with stereotypes and seeing the potential in all Americans.
Yet there is fear, especially among black people, that criticism of him or any of his failures might be twisted into evidence that people of color cannot effectively lead. That amounts to wasting time and energy reacting to hateful stereotypes. It also leads to treating all criticism of Mr. Obama, whether legitimate, wrong-headed or even mean-spirited, as racist.
This is patronizing. Worse, it carries an implicit presumption of inferiority. Every American president must be held to the highest standard. No president of any color should be given a free pass for screw-ups, lies or failure to keep a promise."
So we will not patronize Barack Obama but pay our respect by judging him on his performance alone. We will call it like we see it. Good or bad.
by Boston Tea Party reporter -=Glenn Fannin=-
Friday, January 9, 2009
Global Warming Disaster A Myth!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffe3d/ffe3dbc64f8a2464992eed406d4db72eddda0df7" alt=""
CNN's Glenn Beck reports on the "Climate of Fear" May 2, 2008. Glenn explains global temperature changes are natural. Exposes Al Gore's claim, in the worst case scenario oceans will rise 20 feet. The GCC said in the worst case scenario oceans would rise 20 inches not 20 feet. He discovers CO2 does not drive temperature.
John Coleman (founder of "The Weather Channel"), on Fox News "Red Eye Report" told host Greg Gutfeld he wants to settle the global warming disaster issue by sueing Al Gore. The 17,000 scientist from the 2008 Conferrence on Global Climate Change, who disagree with the I.P.C.C. global warming disaster scenario, ranks have grown to 30,000 scientist. John Coleman explains major news channels have ignored them and this action may be the only way they get coverage. Greg Gutfeld said, about John Coleman, "He hopes the legal challenge will settle the global warming debate once and for all."
Global warming alarmist are worrying people and scaring children to death needlessly. Why? So they can profit from the research dollars the are getting to proliferate this hoax? Liberal fear mongering is about control and taxation. If all this comes as news to you ask why the major news channels have either only touched base on this information or gave it no coverage at all.
by The Boston Tea Party reporter -=Glenn Fannin=-
REFERENCES:
John Stossel 2020 report Global Warming? Really Bad? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUlGoaAOzqA
The 2008 Global Conference on Climate Change http://www.heartland.org/NewYork08/newyork08.html
CNN's Glenn Beck report on the "Climate of Fear" May 2, 2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io-Tb7vTamY
John Coleman amd 30,000 scientist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y48g-7_pccE
CBC News World Documentary Special "Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (1/5)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA
CBC News World Documentary Special "Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (2/5) " http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD6VBLlWmCIv=fD6VBLlWmCI
CBC News World Documentary Special "Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (3/5)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZS2eIRkcR0
CBC News World Documentary Special "Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (4/5)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIbTJ6mhCqk
CBC News World Documentary Special "Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off (5/5)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2XALmrq3ro
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Ultimately Weapons Of Mass Destruction Were Never Found?
According to Wikipedia "Until late 2005, Todd Purdum was a reporter and the Los Angeles bureau chief for the New York Times. From 1994 to 1997, Purdum was a White House correspondent for the Times. Purdum is now the national editor for the pop culture magazine Vanity Fair.
In 1997, Purdum married the former White House Press Secretary, Dee Dee Myers, who served President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1994. Their relationship is the basis for the relationship between C.J. Cregg and Danny Concannon on the TV show The West Wing. Purdum and Myers have two children."
Today, December 29, 2008, in an interview with Meredith Vieira, Todd Purdum made the following comment "Ultimately Weapons of Mass Destruction were never found." Todd Purdum is a President basher who is obvioulsly trying make a career out of his President bashing. In his July 2008 issue of Vanity Fair, Purdum wrote a article bashing former President of the United States Bill Clinton entitled "The Comeback Id." President Clinton responded to Todd Purdum's article by stating, "He's a really dishonest reporter...and I haven't read (the article). There's just five or six blatant lies in there. But he's a real slimy guy."
The amazing thing is major news reporters like Meredith Vieira and Todd Purdum are still making statements Weapons of Mass Destruction were never found. Fox News, in an article written on June 22, 2006 reported, "The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers say." The Philadelphia Inquirer reported on July 6, 2008, in an article by Brian Murphy of the Associated Press, who stated:
"The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program - a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium - reached a Canadian port yesterday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" - the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment - was a significant step toward closing the books on Hussein's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried that the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions."
The 1.2 million pounds of yellowcake uranium was found, and the machinery to convert it, shortly after the Invasion of Iraq in 2003. President Bush kept the find secret, and suffered the wrath of the liberal press, until after ALL the yellow cake uranium was removed from Iraq (for fear of it being stolen by terrorists). John W. Lillpop, in an article posted on the "Borderfire Report" states, "Bush Lied? What About That 550 Metric Tons of Yellow Cake, Lefty?" Follow the link and read the entire article.
So why, do you suppose, the Liberal Press is still reporting Weapons of Mass Destruction were never found and are in complete denial?
by The Boston Tea Party reporter -=Glenn Fannin=-